Connect with us

Politics

America’s hyperbole habit is among the most embarrassing thing ever to happen.

Published

on

Did you hear the latest reports about the imminent end of American democratic institutions?

The President of the United States has been talking about it, how America has accepted Jim Crow 2.0, and the midterm elections that are scheduled to take place in November may be unlegitimate due to the Democrats passed a bill to protect voting rights died to defeat in the Senate the week before.

Republicans Meanwhile, they are busy preparing for the implementation of “soft totalitarianism” on the country by the awake progressives who control all the elite institutions of America and are eager to use their power to eliminate any opposition from every area of human life brutally.

Of course, there’s the threat of COVID-19, even people who are vaccine-free and for children too young to get the vaccine, requiring masks at all elementary levels. If you believe the opposite view, mandates for vaccinations appear to be similar to Nazism.

Do not forget about the possibility of conflict within Eastern Europe, which could lead to the disintegration of NATO and the destabilization of the global order of liberalization.

The biggest threat is the issue of climate change, which is no less than a danger to the very existence of humanity.

There’s no need to worry about all of the claims. However, these hyperbolic assertions (and numerous others) are circulating within our political discourse being spewed out by the Oval Office as well as politicians from the two parties of Congress, which are amplified and repeated by cable news anchors and talk radio hosts within the pages of academic and magazine journals, and obviously on social media.

Does this sound like the worst thing you’ve ever heard of? Not at all. It’s not ideal for our nation’s health (or the psychological well-being of individuals Americans) to hear alarm bells blaring full blast from every possible direction. But that’s how politics unfolds in the present, simultaneously depressing, dulling, and inflicting radicalization on us. We’ve been forced into service as part of an experiment to test the truth of both “Chicken Little” and “The Boy Who Cried, Wolf.”

Like many widespread tendencies, the tendency to constantly exaggerate hyperbole is unavoidable, with many economic and cultural developments encouraging it all at once.

The first issue is partisan polarization that eliminates overlap between parties and further increases the distance between ideological rivals. This creates the impression that the stakes for every election and vote in Congress are unbelievably high, creating an eternal feeling of anxiety and making every move in the political arena the ultimate all-or-nothing choice.

This fear of the political can be accompanied by the fact that the nation is narrowly and deeply divided. Tiny shifts in support in one way or another in particular districts or states could distinguish between one side or the other governing president, Congress, statehouses (and the redistricting of congressional districts), and the judiciary. The same thing can make elections extremely difficult as it forces every political party and its megaphones to carry out the same “get out the vote” operation all year round and use threats and alarm to keep the political blaze going.

There’s also the rise of activism as a method for political involvement. The activists focus on one or a group of related issues and devote all their efforts to gaining the attention of their cause, whether in Congress or within the press, the sector of non-profits, and even within the realm of culture. In a few ways, the act of activism is similar to marketing in its commitment to the maxim that”no publicity is good publicity. There’s no better method to create buzz than to engage in some hype about a situation that needs to be dealt with immediately and use the solution activists prefer.

This is how we have each Democrat in Washington, starting from the first-term backbenchers to the president insisting the American democracy is in danger when the omnibus bill on voting rights isn’t passed. This is also how politics transforms into an endless series of conflicting demanding extremes on each side of every issue, and the way many of the foreign policy choices, including Iraq from Libya to Syria up to Afghanistan and even Taiwan and Ukraine, are presented as a reenactment most dangerous geopolitical blunders in the last 100 years (Neville Chamberlain’s pacification of Hitler’s Germany in 1938 at Munich in 1938).).

To top these factors are the economic incentives. The United States is enormous, with a crowded and distracting public space brimming with competing strategies to grab our attention. To be heard over the noise and gain traffic, ratings, and clicks, television, radio printing media, and online media must get noticed. There is nothing more effective than shouting about falling skies.

Psychological motives are present online, particularly on Twitter, the 24/7 online platform for journalists and activists, celebrities, public-spirited academics, populist leaders, loudmouthed bullies, and malicious bots. In this slum, there are rules for the political sphere and click-seeking journalism apply to people, each of whom is aware that the most radical, unmodified extreme, and outrageous expression of an opinion is likely to be noticed, attract people to like it, and spread much more than attempts at subtlety and fair analysis. Hyperbole is the vocabulary of the world of Twitter and can enhance the efforts of each person to garner cheers and applause.

While I’d like to think this message will be heard over the noise, I’m sure that this warning isn’t a gimmick. The outcome that comes from mutually reinforcing tendencies is a bad thing regardless of whether it will force us into the midst of a civil war. (I’ve had the privilege of being known to play with the idea of hyperbole often.) It’s not a surprise that a significant percentage of the population lives in an eternal state of worry and fear. Although it’s not connected to the actual reality of the United States, this funhouse mirror thinking could easily be carried over to the world of truth and become an auto-fulfilling prophecy instead of an accurate depiction of the current.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

A decline in trust in government demonstrates how critical local politics are.

Published

on

The trust in the government has dropped substantially across the world since the initial times of the deadly pandemic. According to the latest Edelman Trust Barometer, trust in the world’s government has dropped 13 points since May 2020.

In America, the decline is a part of a longer trendline. It is reported that the Pew Research Center has data dating back to the 1950s, which shows a constant decrease in trust in the government. It went between 73% in the year 1958 to a lowly 24 percent in the spring of 2021. Gallup data also indicate the long-term decline of trust in government at the federal level for both the legislative and executive branches.

When the government’s trust declines, it can have significant and grave consequences. Most people realize that a lower level of confidence in the government makes it more difficult for us to resolve our problems as a community and undermines the sense of belonging.

Particularly relevant in this moment, the lack of trust in the government can affect the perceptions of federally-funded or controlled agencies like those of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. These organizations require credibility to be effective during an emergency. My group, called The State Policy Network, has monitored trust levels in various institutions during the outbreak. We discovered that trust in the CDC has dropped from 60 percent in March 2020 to 41% by December 2021. The lack of confidence in government reduces confidence in our processes and procedures, which allow for the peaceful exchange of power and the acceptance of the courts’ decisions. While distrust of the government is an old American tradition, a lack of trust in our leaders is bound to lead to disaster.

The foundation of trust is when the actions are consistent with expectations. The confidence within the Federal government’s performance has dipped because it seldom exceeds expectations, either through over-promising or not delivering. The federal government often claims that it can solve most of our issues if given more funds and authority. However, with each rise in taxes, regulations, and laws, the problem worsens. While the fundamental tasks of the government, like precise financial reporting and prompt tax processing, diminish.

The in-depth Gallup results reveal an intriguing pattern. While the trust level of the government in Washington dipped from 70 percent in 1972 to just 39% in 2021, trust in state governments fell by just six points, ranging from 63 percent to 57%, and the belief in local government increased by three percentage points from 63 percent to 66 percentage. While confidence in Washington falls, many believe that their local government can accomplish.

Surveys of public opinion over the last 50 years have shown that incentive programs have resulted in positive outcomes and increased trust within communities. The optimism is well-placed. Local governments are more efficient than distant Washington. It is more probable for them to be aware of the consequences of policies and act swiftly to rectify unintended consequences. In addition, people with leadership positions are likely to be concerned. Suppose the leaders of a community reside in the community they manage. In that case, they are more likely to have a stake in ensuring the most favorable outcomes and not only those that generate the most funds or receive the most significant public attention.

From the COVID-19 reaction to the state election laws being manipulated, The current administration claims that federal authorities should have more power to address the nation’s challenges. However, it’s been demonstrated that giving more control to the government will result in nothing other than more significant failures and further deterioration of the government’s credibility. The trust will only improve in the event of greater participation from the citizens. Local politics can be a model for nationwide achievement.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump has announced his Tennessee House race endorsement, a test of his political power.

Published

on

The former president Donald Trump made his preference well-known by winning the Republican nomination for a newly created Tennessee House district before the hopeful candidate officially announced his candidacy for this seat. The community, located in Nashville, could be a chance to test Trump as a kingmaker within Republican politics.

Following the announcement that Tennessee Democratic Rep. Jim Cooper announced on Tuesday that he would retire after the current year, Trump touted a run to succeed him by the former State Department spokeswoman and Fox News presenter Morgan Ortagus. Although Ortagus has not yet announced her intentions to run, several established Republicans consider a run for the position.

REP. JIM COOPER ANNOUNCES RETIREMENT, CITING GOP TENNESSEE REDISTRICTING PLAN

“I am told the very strong and impressive Morgan Ortagus is exploring a run for Congress in Tennessee’s 5th Congressional District. I couldn’t be happier because she’s an absolute warrior for America First and MAGA!” Trump declared.

Ortagus Thanked Trump via Twitter, a platform for which he is suspended, for his endorsement; however, she has not announced her candidacy.

Nashville is a liberal-leaning enclave that is home to state government employees in the capital of Tennessee and scholars and undergraduates from Vanderbilt University, which is being divided into three districts. The district that Nashville-based Cooper was a member of for over 20 years (plus a 1983-95 House time in a rural region) is now being changed to favor Republicans. The goal is to transform Tennessee’s present House delegation comprised seven Republicans to two Democrats to eight GOP lawmakers and one Democratic one.

Trump’s decision to apply anointing to Ortagus has riled those who are his supporters. They argue that Trump should have backed the music-video producer Robby Starbuck. Starbuck put forth an effort to run for the post last year and has tried to align himself with Trump.

The former Tennessee State House Speaker Beth Harwell is also reportedly contemplating a bid to run for the Republican nomination, Maury County mayor Andy Ogles and attorney Kurt Winstead. A House campaign by Harwell, who was a former state Republican Party chairwoman, would be “formidable” in the race, according to John Geer, a Vanderbilt University political scientist who is also a co-director of the poll.

Despite what Geer stated, the new configuration of the 5th Congressional District is not an easy win for Republicans. If Cooper had decided to run for office, Geer said, “He might have been able to win.”

DEMOCRATS PUSH BIDEN TO HONOR PLEDGE FOR BLACK, FEMALE SUPREME COURT PICK

“He has name recognition, and people respect him and, and he’s, you know, not an AOC-type Democrat,” Geer stated and added that absent a notable Democrat becomes involved, “the battle now is likely going to turn to the Republican primary to see who gets the nomination and therefore has an edge in the general election come this November.”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Democrats seeking to succeed Cooper are likely to include community activists Odessa Kelly. When it was clear that the state Republicans were planning to dismantle the 5th Congressional District to divide into its Nashville supporters, Kelly had already launched an initial campaign for the seat of Cooper, who is a leftist.

Kelly stated in a Facebook post that she intends to run for office. However, other candidates could also be in the race before the deadline for filing in April.

Continue Reading

Politics

The ordinary’s transformative politics,

Published

on

We voted for Democrats in 2020. It’s time that Democrats stand for us in 2022.

The nation faces the unavoidable consequences of climate change, a housing and affordability crisis, pandemics, gun violence, and racial inequality. As elected officials continue to take in more and more money day after day, working-class and middle-class families continue their losses. Corporate politicians from both parties are putting their financial interests ahead of their jobs.

I was not raised in a political family, nor was I groomed to run for higher office. I am a community activist, climate researcher, and rising educator. You can also vote for me in the State House.

If we demand it, I believe better is possible. We need someone to stand up and defend us.

Michigan should be a place where people thrive and can build a better future. Family incomes below $65,000 per year are eligible for tuition-free college or trade school. The environment and our posterity must be protected with a bold climate plan that stops Line 5 and implements comprehensive polluter-pay legislation. Michigan should also transition to solar and wind energy as soon as possible. It is essential to identify and root out the systemic causes of racism, hatred, and other forms of violence by reforming our institutions.

I am committed to keeping the promises made by the political establishment of Lansing.

Special interests were awakened when I announced my candidacy in April last year. A first-time candidate, who hoped to deliver for the people and not corporations, they disrupted the carefully calculated game of shifting positions from one political insider into the next. I was asked almost immediately to withdraw my candidacy. They said that I was too young and too naive to win. You can still have your chance in a few decades. Unfortunately, people elect their representatives.

These conversations always bring me back to why I started running: for real, tangible change.

The status quo is no longer appealing to people.

We are tired of being forced to choose between two options and repeatedly voting for the same politicians.

People want to make a difference for their families, children, and communities. They are not those who have been in government for many decades. People who have experienced the challenges and corridors of life. We are experts on the problems and have solutions. Let’s create a future we can be proud of.

I am asking for your vote to help me build something better on August 2nd.

A society that is fair and just for everyone. A system that will stand by you when you are ready to. A government that works for all, not just a few.

Continue Reading

Trending